‘The Dutch business register needs significant changes in the field of ICT.’

issue: At https://kvk.nl just one domain is shown.
proposal: Do no limit in the detail screen to just one url;

issue: English language is not supported in advanced search, and its url.
proposal: Make also readable in English for eg a .eu domain by ‘EURid vzw’;

issue: Strict search, instead of the current wild search, is not possible.
proposal: Add a ‘strict search’ form field to be ticked or not;

issue: SIDN pays for retrieval, otherwise the registry cannot rely on complete naming information.
proposal: Include public retrieval in indirect costs;

issue: A business holder may already enter several url’s in his / her portal.
proposal: Provide a realtime check on holder’s name from SIDN (.nl), and other registries;

issue: An organization may feel the need to be in control regarding its web domains.
proposal: Email Whois status two months before an organization’s fiscal year ends;

Suggested data structure:
holder_name_public: no retrieval, not visible, visible.
holder_name_status: no retrieval, does not match, does almost match, does exactly match.
visible_to_public: no, yes (listing all web domains of an organization, may use this field);

Regarding financial statements:
Output needs to be sufficient for an organization to be in control.
Per balance sheet date may cause a storage and / or performance problem.
For auditing, a six-monthly audit is, I think, sufficient for timely improvement.

Note: No public holder name in case of a .nl domain, is caused by holder type private.